Remove /download/ directory from robots.txt#301
Merged
rnsloan merged 1 commit intonodejs:masterfrom Oct 30, 2015
rnsloan:robots-downloads
Merged
Remove /download/ directory from robots.txt#301rnsloan merged 1 commit intonodejs:masterfrom rnsloan:robots-downloads
rnsloan merged 1 commit intonodejs:masterfrom
rnsloan:robots-downloads
Conversation
rnsloan
changed the title
Member
|
LGTM |
rnsloan
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 30, 2015
Remove /download/ directory from robots.txt
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
fixes #240 .
As per instructions in #240, /download/ requests are now being returned with header
x-robots-tag: noindexnodejs/build#231 .Final step is to remove the entries from
robots.txtbecause otherwise search crawlers will not be able to see the new header https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/93710?hl=en&ref_topic=4598466